An order of protection may be granted in a number of different cases pursuant to various criminal and civil statutes, including Criminal Procedural Law sections 530.12(1) and 530.13(1); Articles 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 of the Family Court Act; and Section 240(3) of the Domestic Relations Law.  Generally, orders of protection fall under two categories, temporary and permanent.  A temporary order of protection is typically made during the pendency of the action.  A permanent order of protection is usually issued at the conclusion or disposition of the case.  Frequently, temporary orders of protection precede permanent orders of protection.  

New York Law prohibits the extension of an order of protection to a person(s) unrelated to the underlying criminal action.  See People v. Konieczny, 2004 WL 1263762 (N.Y. 2004).  The order of protection may cover the complainant and family or household, but not beyond.  People v. Petrusch, 306 A.D.2d 889.

Orders of protection may also be issued in instances where the person being “protected” by the order opposes the terms of the order of protection and does not want the defendant being barred from contacting him or her.  People v. Monacelli, 299 A.D.2d 916.  This particular event often occurs in cases involving spouses and families. 

In criminal cases, an order of protection may be part of the court’s order allowing for the defendant release from custody.  CPL Sections 530.12 (family offenses) and CPL 530.13 (non-family offenses).  At times, a court may issue an order of protection on its own, based upon “good cause shown”, when an accusatory instrument (complaint) is filed by the prosecution.  In such an instance, the defendant has a right to contest the issuance of the order of protection in those circumstances where a constitutionally protected right, such as being excluded from the defendant’s residence or being prohibited from contacting the defendant’s family, is restricted.

Also, a court can suspend or revoke a pistol permit and possession of firearms.  A defendant has a right to hearing on the issue of firearms.  It should be noted that a violation of an order of protection due to firearm possession is also a violation of federal criminal law.

By understanding these important aspect of the law as they pertain to orders of protection, the criminal, matrimonial and family law (child custody, child support, family offense) trial attorneys of Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP continue to successfully assist their many clients.

If you or someone you know needs the assistant of a criminal, family or matrimonial attorney, please contact Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP for a free consultation.  The firms trial attorneys regularly appear in the courts of Westchester, Bronx, Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess and Orange Counties in New York State.

In the absence of an express contract, parents have no duty to support an adult child.  For custody, visitation and other purposes, the age of majority in New York is 18 years, but child support remains until 21.  However, this duty is not absolute. 

 The child support obligation may be suspended or terminated before the child is 21 if the child becomes emancipated by becoming economically independent of his or her parents through employment, marriage or entry into military service. 

Under unusual circumstances, a child may be deemed emancipated is he or she is guilty of outrageous misbehavior, such as it makes it inequitable to enforce the New York child support obligation, or if without cause, the child withdraws from parental control and supervision.  In other words, if a child refuses to abide by a parents reasonable rules and decides to leave that parents control, the other parent who is still obligated to pay child support can seek a court order to have the child support obligation suspended or terminated.   It is important to chose an attorney who can assist you in navigating the difficult aspects of child support. 

Please contact Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP to discuss your child support rights.

Simply put, as a result of the housing crisis, the value of the home is worth less than the mortgage owed and this makes the process of splitting up that much harder.

These issues were recently feautured in an article in the New York Times.

In making the decision to get divorced it is important to select an New York Divorce attorney who has the experience in dealing with these difficult financial issues.  At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, we have the experience you need in order to ensure that even in these difficult financial times, that your interests are protected.  We can structure settlements in a divorce on your behalf that will help to protect your credit and your finances, even in an uncertain market.

Under New York State law, when a party enters into a stipulation in a divore or matrimonial action regarding child support and that party wishes to modify the child support order, the party must demonstrate an unreasonable or unanticipated change in circumstance.  Moreover, New York state child support enforcement law requires that a party for a downward modification for child support show that his or her change in circumstances is substantial. 

So in other words, in order to avoid potential New York State child support enforcement against a party, that party under New York State child support law, must draft a divorce or matrimonial agreement very carefully. 

At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP,   we have experience drafting such agreements to avoid litigation regarding unanticipated or unforseen circumstances.  We can  handle issues to lower child support and avoid New York State child support enforcement for clients.  Under New York law, child support is handled using a child support calculator and it usually involves a percentage of the income of the parent who does not have child custody.  We also handles such cases on behalf of clients to increase child support under New York law.