Changes to the New York State DWI Laws

New DWI Felony

It is now a class “E” felony to drive while intoxicated (DWI) with a child 15 years of age or younger in the car.  In addition, if the defendant is the parent, legal guardian, or custodian of the child in the vehicle, the police MUST file a report with Child Protective Services (CPS). 

Also, in Westchester County and other surrounding counties such as Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange and the Bronx it is common to see an additional charge of Endangering the Welfare of a Child (EWC) for such a DWI arrest. 

This new felony change and the usual accompanying EWC charge are common and place a burden on the defendant not only with respect to a criminal charge but also for school, employment and special licenses in addition to the penalties for DWI.  It is common to have to address most of these penalties even before one is found guilty.   Prompt legal representation is very important to address these issues to aggressively present the best defense.

Ignition Interlock Device — New Law

Beginning on August 15, 2010, courts will be required to sentence defendants after conviction for a DWI offense to probation or a conditional discharge a condition of which MUST be the installation and maintenance of an ignition interlock device in any car owned or operated by the defendant for the duration of the probation or conditional discharge or 6 months, whichever is longer.

The cost of the installation and maintenance must be paid by the defendant unless the court finds that the person is financially unable to afford the cost in such cases the court may waive the cost or impose the cost pursuant to a payment plan.

DWI Law Updates

For more information about the DWI law changes or DWI laws in New York State in general feel free to contact our firm.  We appear in all courts in New York including Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, Rockland and New York City.

Defending Multiple DWI Convictions

A second DWI charge within 10 years could be prosecuted as a felony.  This felony prosecution is discretionary unlike a predicate felony — second felony offender, that the prosecution must pursue.

Both predicate felony offender status and felony DWI invlove a conviction within 10 years. 

Predicate Felony

In calculating the time for a predicate felony, the law states that “sentencemust have been imposed more than 10 years before the commission of the felony” PL 70.06(1)(b)(iv). 

Felony DWI Law

The felony DWI statute refers to committing the new offense “after having been convicted of” the predicate crime.  VTL 1193(1)(c)(i).

This is an important distinction.  It is very important in either a DWI felony sitiuation or a Felony under the Penal Law to know this difference.

A “conviction” is defined in the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) as “the entry of a plea of guilty to, or a verdict of guilty upon an accusatory instrument” CPL 1.20(13).  A judgment is the conviction AND the sentence imposed.  Sometimes in criminal court the conviction will be months before the sentence.  Usually this occurs when the Court orders a pre-sentence report from the Department of Probation.

Felony DWI Example

Where a motorist was sentencedon the prior DWI and occurred within the 10 year limit, but the motorist plead guilty or was convicted at trial more than10 years ago, felony DWI status should not apply.  Therefore, where sentencing is adjourned this time delay should not be used at a later point to increase a seconf felony DWI to a felony.

Misdemeanor DWI

In any DWI offense this rule will apply.  For example, two prior DWAIs within 10 years raises the current DWAI to a Misdemeanor from a violation.

Defense of a Felony DWI

In order to present the best criminal defense a criminal defense attorney in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam counties or elsewhere need to be aware of the date of arrest, conviction and sentence in order to properly defend a DWI felony charge.

During a trial the government needs to prove each and every element of a crime.  In cases such as petit larceny, assault, weapons possession, driving with a suspended license (AUO) (511(1)(a)) and other similar crimes a lab report is not needed.  But in cases such as DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and drug cases such as criminal possession of a controlled substance and criminal sale of a controlled substance a lab report will be  needed to be introduced at sometime during the trial.

District Attorneys have relied on certified records to introduce certain lab reports in DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and other drug cases instead of having the actual lab analyst testify.  This seems to be changing with the most recent US Supreme Court case as outlined below.

Lab Reports at Trial in DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug  and Drug Cases

At trial for an offense involving any Laboratory Report (usually a drug, DWI or gun charge case) the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment requires a criminal accused to be confronted with the testimony of lab analysts.

The United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 129 S Ct 2527, held that a lab analyst’s certificate is testimonial and can not be admitted unless the analyst was unavailable to testify at trial and the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the analyst.

DWI Blood/Breath Test Lab Reports

In Nassau County after a DWI trial the court sustained the defendant’s objection to the admission of the calibration log of the breathalyzer machine used to test his blood alcohol level as a certified business record and required the prosecution to present live testimony from the lab technicians who preformed the calibration.

The Best Criminal Defense

The best criminal defense is one that holds the government to their burden on each and every element of the crime.  This is especially true of DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other Controlled Substance cases where a lab report is necessary.  In Westchester, Rockland, Bronx, Orange, Putnam and Dutchess counties the government will have their own report usually from the County Department of Lab and Research.  These lab reports must be attacked for their accuracy.  This additional requirement that the government bring the actual analyst into court is helpful to the experienced criminal defense attorney and the accused since it opens the door to in depth cross examination.

White Plains City Court Criminal Defense 

In the City Court of White Plains there has been an increase use by the department of labs and research in Westchester County of “preliminary” lab reports to support DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other drug charges.  These lab reports are the very reports that need to be scrutinized for their accuracy and demanding the actual lab analyst to testify will help any criminal defense.

Southeast DWI Criminal Defense

Likewise, for any criminal defense for a DWI, DWAI, DWAI drug charge in busy DWI courts such as the Town of Southeast in Putnam County (Brewster).  These lab reports must be scrutinized as they usually are the prosecutions strongest form of evidence.

In New York State if a motorist is involved in an automobile accident and does not report that accident it can open the motorist up to criminal prosecution.  There are two very different types of charges under the Vehicle and Traffic Law for leaving the scene of an accident without reporting.  As white plains felony charges lawyers and traffic violations attorneys we want you to know the different classes of offenses and potential sentences for each.

Leaving the scene of a PROPERTY damage accident without reporting

VTL 600(1) provides that ” Any person operating a motor vehicle who, knowing or having cause to know that damage has been caused to the real property or to the personal property … due to an incident involving the motor vehicle operated by such person shall, before leaving the place where the damage occurred, stop, exhibit his or her license and insurance identification card for such vehicle, … and give his or her name, residence, including street and number, insurance carrier … and license number to the party sustaining damage, or in case the person sustaining the damage is not present at the place where the damage occurred then he or she shall report the same as soon as physically able to the nearest police station, or judicial officer.”

A violation of VTL 600(1)(a) is a traffic infraction punishable by :

1. A fine of up to $250;

2. Up to 15 days in jail; or

3. Both

Leaving the scene of a PERSONAL INJURY accident without reporting

VTL 600(2)(a)  “Any person operating a motor vehicle who, knowing or having cause to know that personal injury has been caused to another person, due to an incident involving the motor vehicle operated by such person shall before leaving the place where the said personal injury occurred, stop, exhibit his or her license and insurance identification … to the injured party, if practical, and also to a police officer, or in the event that no police officer is in the vicinity of the place of said injury, then he or she shall report said incident as soon as physically able to the nearest police station or judicial officer.”

The level of the offense and the punishment depends upon if the mororist has ever committed this crime in the past and also the level of injury or death of the party.  Leaving the scene of a Personal Injury Accident is a CRIME and ranges from a class “B” misdemeanor to a class “D” felony.  The Sentences for Misdemeanors and felony range from fines, probation to jail.

Leaving the scene of a PERSONAL INJURY accident is a fingerprintable offense and a crime.  Any conviction will result in a license revocation and the motorist will not be permitted to obtain a conditional license.

In any criminal defense its important to know the classes of misdemeanors and the types of misdemeanor crimes including felonies.  Here in this case leaving the scene of a property damage accident is a noncriminal offense while leaving the scene of a personal injury accident is a crime.

If you have any questions how these charges are defended or how they relate to other charges such as driving while intoxicated (DWI) or driving while ability impaired (DWAI) contact my office for a free consultation.

DWI arrest & BAC level

In a DWI arrest the police will need to use a method to test the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of a driver’s blood to determine if the driver is intoxicated or impaired after consuming alcohol.  The most common method is to have the motorist blow into a machine to test the alcohol level in the motorist blood.  The machine looks like a large computer and has a keypad in the front.  After blowing into a tube for a few seconds the machine will test the motorist’s breath and submit a result to the police.   The machine’s calibration in any DWI test must be investigated and attacked.

Proof of Breathalyzer Calibration

In New York State the proof necessary by the prosecution in a DWI case is that the Breathalyzer was in proper working order at the time the test was administered to the motorist.  The prosecution has this burden at trial and must prove this element beyond a reasonable doubt.  The prosecution typically introduce into evidence a document entitled “record of calibration/maintenance.”  This is also called the certificate of calibration of the Breathalyzer.

What is a Calibration?

In the field of DWI defense “calibration” refers to the inspection, calibration and repair of the breath test devices by specially trained technicians at facilities such as the New York State Police Crime Laboratory or the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Public Safety.  This calibration is NOT the weekly test conducted by the police officers at the police station.  This is a much more complex test for calibration.

Suppression of a Breath Test due to Calibration

In People v Todd, 79 Misc.2d 630, a breathalyzer had not been calibrated for six months and the People failed to establish that the breathalyzer apparatus had been timely calibrated hence the results of the test were inadmissible.  It is incumbent upon the District Attorney to show that the machine was in proper working order.

Todd Six Month Calibration Rule

Although lower courts have expanded the six month rule with respect to the calibration of a Breathalyzer the Court of Appeals has never reversed or altered its six month rule.  This is something that the best criminal defense DWI lawyers must investigate when defending a DWI arrest.

New Breathalyzer Machines

The New York State Police have chosen to calibrate their newest breath test device, the Draeger AlcoTest 7110 MK III (Draeger) only one a year.  Regardless the prosecution must lay a sufficient foundation as to the reliability of the Draeger.  The Todd rule should apply and the government can present expert witnesses to prove calibration.

DWI Defense Lawyers

At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP our DWI defense lawyers investigate every aspect of a DWI arrest.  The best DWI defense will take advantage of every opportunity to limit the government’s case or have the case dismissed outright.  The calibration of the breathalyzer is only one part of the defense to a chemical test of a motorist’s breath test but an important part since the local police have no control over the calibration and usually have no idea how the machine is calibrated.

Free Consultation on all DWI arrests and cases

To have your case reviewed for Free call our office.  We represent clients in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam, Bronx & Dutchess Counties.  Our attorneys are former prosecutors and dedicated to reviewing your matter and providing you with the best criminal defense.  The Breathlyzer calibration is an important part of a DWI criminal defense and our Westchester County DWI lawyers will review your case, identify the best defense and give you candid straightforward advice.