New DWI Felony

It is now a class “E” felony to drive while intoxicated (DWI) with a child 15 years of age or younger in the car.  In addition, if the defendant is the parent, legal guardian, or custodian of the child in the vehicle, the police MUST file a report with Child Protective Services (CPS). 

Also, in Westchester County and other surrounding counties such as Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange and the Bronx it is common to see an additional charge of Endangering the Welfare of a Child (EWC) for such a DWI arrest. 

This new felony change and the usual accompanying EWC charge are common and place a burden on the defendant not only with respect to a criminal charge but also for school, employment and special licenses in addition to the penalties for DWI.  It is common to have to address most of these penalties even before one is found guilty.   Prompt legal representation is very important to address these issues to aggressively present the best defense.

Ignition Interlock Device — New Law

Beginning on August 15, 2010, courts will be required to sentence defendants after conviction for a DWI offense to probation or a conditional discharge a condition of which MUST be the installation and maintenance of an ignition interlock device in any car owned or operated by the defendant for the duration of the probation or conditional discharge or 6 months, whichever is longer.

The cost of the installation and maintenance must be paid by the defendant unless the court finds that the person is financially unable to afford the cost in such cases the court may waive the cost or impose the cost pursuant to a payment plan.

DWI Law Updates

For more information about the DWI law changes or DWI laws in New York State in general feel free to contact our firm.  We appear in all courts in New York including Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, Rockland and New York City.

A second DWI charge within 10 years could be prosecuted as a felony.  This felony prosecution is discretionary unlike a predicate felony — second felony offender, that the prosecution must pursue.

Both predicate felony offender status and felony DWI invlove a conviction within 10 years. 

Predicate Felony

In calculating the time for a predicate felony, the law states that “sentencemust have been imposed more than 10 years before the commission of the felony” PL 70.06(1)(b)(iv). 

Felony DWI Law

The felony DWI statute refers to committing the new offense “after having been convicted of” the predicate crime.  VTL 1193(1)(c)(i).

This is an important distinction.  It is very important in either a DWI felony sitiuation or a Felony under the Penal Law to know this difference.

A “conviction” is defined in the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) as “the entry of a plea of guilty to, or a verdict of guilty upon an accusatory instrument” CPL 1.20(13).  A judgment is the conviction AND the sentence imposed.  Sometimes in criminal court the conviction will be months before the sentence.  Usually this occurs when the Court orders a pre-sentence report from the Department of Probation.

Felony DWI Example

Where a motorist was sentencedon the prior DWI and occurred within the 10 year limit, but the motorist plead guilty or was convicted at trial more than10 years ago, felony DWI status should not apply.  Therefore, where sentencing is adjourned this time delay should not be used at a later point to increase a seconf felony DWI to a felony.

Misdemeanor DWI

In any DWI offense this rule will apply.  For example, two prior DWAIs within 10 years raises the current DWAI to a Misdemeanor from a violation.

Defense of a Felony DWI

In order to present the best criminal defense a criminal defense attorney in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam counties or elsewhere need to be aware of the date of arrest, conviction and sentence in order to properly defend a DWI felony charge.

District Attorneys have relied on certified records to introduce certain lab reports in DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and other drug cases instead of having the actual lab analyst testify.  This seems to be changing with the most recent US Supreme Court case as outlined below.

Lab Reports at Trial in DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug  and Drug Cases

At trial for an offense involving any Laboratory Report (usually a drug, DWI or gun charge case) the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment requires a criminal accused to be confronted with the testimony of lab analysts.

The United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 129 S Ct 2527, held that a lab analyst’s certificate is testimonial and can not be admitted unless the analyst was unavailable to testify at trial and the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the analyst.

DWI Blood/Breath Test Lab Reports

In Nassau County after a DWI trial the court sustained the defendant’s objection to the admission of the calibration log of the breathalyzer machine used to test his blood alcohol level as a certified business record and required the prosecution to present live testimony from the lab technicians who preformed the calibration.

The Best Criminal Defense

The best criminal defense is one that holds the government to their burden on each and every element of the crime.  This is especially true of DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other Controlled Substance cases where a lab report is necessary.  In Westchester, Rockland, Bronx, Orange, Putnam and Dutchess counties the government will have their own report usually from the County Department of Lab and Research.  These lab reports must be attacked for their accuracy.  This additional requirement that the government bring the actual analyst into court is helpful to the experienced criminal defense attorney and the accused since it opens the door to in depth cross examination.

White Plains City Court Criminal Defense 

In the City Court of White Plains there has been an increase use by the department of labs and research in Westchester County of “preliminary” lab reports to support DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other drug charges.  These lab reports are the very reports that need to be scrutinized for their accuracy and demanding the actual lab analyst to testify will help any criminal defense.

Southeast DWI Criminal Defense

Likewise, for any criminal defense for a DWI, DWAI, DWAI drug charge in busy DWI courts such as the Town of Southeast in Putnam County (Brewster).  These lab reports must be scrutinized as they usually are the prosecutions strongest form of evidence.

Leaving the scene of a PROPERTY damage accident without reporting

VTL 600(1) provides that ” Any person operating a motor vehicle who, knowing or having cause to know that damage has been caused to the real property or to the personal property … due to an incident involving the motor vehicle operated by such person shall, before leaving the place where the damage occurred, stop, exhibit his or her license and insurance identification card for such vehicle, … and give his or her name, residence, including street and number, insurance carrier … and license number to the party sustaining damage, or in case the person sustaining the damage is not present at the place where the damage occurred then he or she shall report the same as soon as physically able to the nearest police station, or judicial officer.”

A violation of VTL 600(1)(a) is a traffic infraction punishable by :

1. A fine of up to $250;

2. Up to 15 days in jail; or

3. Both

Leaving the scene of a PERSONAL INJURY accident without reporting

VTL 600(2)(a)  “Any person operating a motor vehicle who, knowing or having cause to know that personal injury has been caused to another person, due to an incident involving the motor vehicle operated by such person shall before leaving the place where the said personal injury occurred, stop, exhibit his or her license and insurance identification … to the injured party, if practical, and also to a police officer, or in the event that no police officer is in the vicinity of the place of said injury, then he or she shall report said incident as soon as physically able to the nearest police station or judicial officer.”

The level of the offense and the punishment depends upon if the mororist has ever committed this crime in the past and also the level of injury or death of the party.  Leaving the scene of a Personal Injury Accident is a CRIME and ranges from a class “B” misdemeanor to a class “D” felony.  The Sentences for Misdemeanors and felony range from fines, probation to jail.

Leaving the scene of a PERSONAL INJURY accident is a fingerprintable offense and a crime.  Any conviction will result in a license revocation and the motorist will not be permitted to obtain a conditional license.

In any criminal defense its important to know the classes of misdemeanors and the types of misdemeanor crimes including felonies.  Here in this case leaving the scene of a property damage accident is a noncriminal offense while leaving the scene of a personal injury accident is a crime.

If you have any questions how these charges are defended or how they relate to other charges such as driving while intoxicated (DWI) or driving while ability impaired (DWAI) contact my office for a free consultation.

In a DWI arrest the police will need to use a method to test the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of a driver’s blood to determine if the driver is intoxicated or impaired after consuming alcohol.  The most common method is to have the motorist blow into a machine to test the alcohol level in the motorist blood.  The machine looks like a large computer and has a keypad in the front.  After blowing into a tube for a few seconds the machine will test the motorist’s breath and submit a result to the police.   The machine’s calibration in any DWI test must be investigated and attacked.

Proof of Breathalyzer Calibration

In New York State the proof necessary by the prosecution in a DWI case is that the Breathalyzer was in proper working order at the time the test was administered to the motorist.  The prosecution has this burden at trial and must prove this element beyond a reasonable doubt.  The prosecution typically introduce into evidence a document entitled “record of calibration/maintenance.”  This is also called the certificate of calibration of the Breathalyzer.

What is a Calibration?

In the field of DWI defense “calibration” refers to the inspection, calibration and repair of the breath test devices by specially trained technicians at facilities such as the New York State Police Crime Laboratory or the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Public Safety.  This calibration is NOT the weekly test conducted by the police officers at the police station.  This is a much more complex test for calibration.

Suppression of a Breath Test due to Calibration

In People v Todd, 79 Misc.2d 630, a breathalyzer had not been calibrated for six months and the People failed to establish that the breathalyzer apparatus had been timely calibrated hence the results of the test were inadmissible.  It is incumbent upon the District Attorney to show that the machine was in proper working order.

Todd Six Month Calibration Rule

Although lower courts have expanded the six month rule with respect to the calibration of a Breathalyzer the Court of Appeals has never reversed or altered its six month rule.  This is something that the best criminal defense DWI lawyers must investigate when defending a DWI arrest.

New Breathalyzer Machines

The New York State Police have chosen to calibrate their newest breath test device, the Draeger AlcoTest 7110 MK III (Draeger) only one a year.  Regardless the prosecution must lay a sufficient foundation as to the reliability of the Draeger.  The Todd rule should apply and the government can present expert witnesses to prove calibration.

DWI Defense Lawyers

At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP our DWI defense lawyers investigate every aspect of a DWI arrest.  The best DWI defense will take advantage of every opportunity to limit the government’s case or have the case dismissed outright.  The calibration of the breathalyzer is only one part of the defense to a chemical test of a motorist’s breath test but an important part since the local police have no control over the calibration and usually have no idea how the machine is calibrated.

Free Consultation on all DWI arrests and cases

To have your case reviewed for Free call our office.  We represent clients in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam, Bronx & Dutchess Counties.  Our attorneys are former prosecutors and dedicated to reviewing your matter and providing you with the best criminal defense.  The Breathlyzer calibration is an important part of a DWI criminal defense and our Westchester County DWI lawyers will review your case, identify the best defense and give you candid straightforward advice.

Field Sobriety Tests (FST) are a common method to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that a person is Driving While Intoxicated (DWI).  The New York State police, local police and county police use FST as part of any DWI stop and DWI investigation.  In those tests a motorist is asked to step out of their vehicle and engage in a number of physical acts which are designed to test a person’s coordination for the purposes of determining intoxication.  Motorists generally cooperate with these tests and rarely refuse to take these FST.  If the FST are refused your driver’s license will NOT be suspended unlike a chemical test refusal.

In any DWI investigation in New York State, these tests will be offered.  In Bedford Court in Westchester County, White Plains City Court in Westchester County, Yonkers City Court, Southeast (Brewster) Court, or any other court in Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam or Dutchess Counties the Courts will provide a motorist a list of FST at arraignment.  It is usually a form with boxes checked off regarding the test, if the tests were refused and if the motorist passed or failed the FST.  The State Police have a standardized form but local police may used their own form.

What are These Tests?

The FST commonly use include the following:

1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN) –  In this test the office asks you to follow his pen with your eyes.  The test looks for an involuntary jerking motion of your eyes.  Although this test can be used by the officer to determine intoxication it is rarely admitted into evidence at trial.
2. The Walk and Turn Test — In this test you are asked to walk heal to toe, turn and walk heal to toe again.  Usually it is anywhere from 1-10 steps.  Rarely is this test given on a flat surface on a painted line.  Usually its on the side of the road with cars driving by at 60-70 miles per hour, at night with the police car lights flashing in the background. 
3. One Leg Stand — The officer will ask you to stand on one leg for 30 seconds.  The officer is looking for swaying, moving arms up more than six inches for balance (most individuals keep their arms to their side making the test very hard), hopping or putting your foot down.
4. Finger to Nose Test — In this test a motorist is asked to stand with their feet together, close their eyes, extend their arms out and touch the tip of their finger to the tip of their nose.
5. ABC Test — In the Alphabet test, the officer will ask the motorist to recite the alphabet test usually from the middle to the end.

The Defense to the DWI, Field Sobriety Tests

There may be additional tests but the above are the major tests a police officer will use to determine intoxication.  The tests are all defensible.  The best criminal defense to a DWI charge is an attack of these tests including:

1. Lack of instructions regarding how to perform the test.
2. Lack of officer demonstration regarding how to perform the test.
3. Conditions during the test, such as performed on a busy highway.
4. The subjective nature of the test.
5. Officer’s presumption of guilt that they are just “going through the motions” before an arrest.
6. The officer rushing the tests.
7. The motorist actually passed the test and the officer marked it as failed.

There are of course more ways to defend the FST test but this is just a general line of attack for the best criminal defense, every person is in a different position.  For example, in the defense of a DWI charge on 684 in North Castle (Armonk), New York the officer allowed a women to take her 2 inch high heals off but was told to perform the one leg stand test and walk and turn test on the side of the road with rocks, dirt and even glass under her feet clearly putting her at a disadvantage.  The defense of a DWI charge is always tailored to your specific facts and circumstances.

Criminal Defense of the Field Sobriety Tests

FST in any criminal defense must be attacked since the District Attorney will use that test as strong evidence of guilt.  Since all the police have to do is check off a box there is the temptation to rush through the tests and check off as many boxes as possible.  That is the first and best criminal defense to DWI, FST.  Our DWI criminal defense lawyers cross examine the administration of the tests and the motorist’s performance but also the validity of the tests as an indicator of intoxication and the subjectivity of the judgment of the police officer.

FST and a Chemical Test Refusal

As a criminal defense attorney and a DWI criminal defense attorney I always prepare the best defense for my clients.  I review the evidence from the District Attorney and determine if they have a strong case or a weak case. 

FST will be used as evidence of guilt but your driver’s license will NOT be suspended if you refuse to take any of those tests.  However, if you refuse to submit to a chemical test your driver’s license will be suspended and you may also face civil penalties.  A chemical test will also be used a evidence of guilt. 

If its one’s goal to minimize the amount of evidence against them at trial and they refuse a chemical test to accomplish this the FST should be refused as well. 

The DWI Arrest

If the police feel you are intoxicated or impaired (DWI) (DWAI) they will make an arrest.  The best course of action after any arrest is to call a DWI criminal defense attorney.  Not only can a lawyer explain your rights to you and the best defense for your case but you should immediately feel better that your lawyer is attacking the case and will do whatever necessary to protect you.

If you or a family member is charged with a DWI related offense call my office for a free consultation.  We regularly appear in the Courts of Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, Rockland and the Bronx.

Types of traffic stops by police officers are common question at my office.  Everyone seems to think that you can be pulled over “when you do something wrong” and that’s true but the Vehicle and Traffic Law goes beyond that and makes rules to protect driver’s.  A general understanding of the law will help you be prepared as you drive the roads of New York State and help you protect your rights.

• THE BAD TRAFFIC STOP

The police may NOT stop a vehicle on a public highway for a routine traffic check.  ONLY when the officer has “reasonable suspicion” to believe that a violation or crime is committed may the vehicle be stopped.  People v Ingle, 36 NY 2d 413.  A police officer’s good faith but erroneous belief that a person committed a traffic infraction (failing to signal when exiting a private driveway) will not support a stop.  Byer v Jackson, 241 AD 2d 943.

• TRAFFIC COURT

In New York Traffic Court either at the Traffic Violation Bureau (TVB) or in the local justice Courts, the Courts must evaluate police conduct and determine whether the action taken was justified in its inception and at every subsequent stage of the encounter.  People v Nicodemus, 247 AD 2d 833.  However, a police officer’s failure to issue a ticket for a traffic infraction that was the basis for the stop does not defeat probable cause.  People v Ferraiolo, 309 AD 2d 981.

• DWI STOP AND ARREST

In a DWI arrest the office first needs a reason to pull you over.  Most police officers will find a violation of the vehicle and traffic law such as speeding, weaving out of lane or as a last resort a police officer may use an equipment violation if they suspect a motorist is driving DWI.  Importantly, weaving or swerving IN a lane is not a traffic infraction and does not constitute reasonable suspicion.  People v Culcross, 184 Misc. 2d 67.  A stop for unsafe lane change requires a driver to signal each time when changing lanes as well as turning.  People v Rice, 44 AD 3d 247.  Lastly, stopping a car and approaching it with guns drawn based upon an anonymous report was improper, where there was no reasonable suspicion.  People v Heapps, 13 AD 3d 107.

• REASONABLE SUSPICION

Reasonable suspicion is the standard the police must use to pull over a motorist.  This is always the first line of attack when defending a traffic ticket or a move serious charge such as DWI, DWAI, DUI or even traffic stops that result in other charges such as drug or gun charges.  Reasonable Suspicion is that amount of knowledge sufficient to justify  a stop.

• NEW YORK STATE TRAFFIC VIOLATION ATTORNEYS

If you have any questions about when can the police pull you over contact one of the attorneys at Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP.  We offer a free consultation.  Our attorneys regularly appear in the traffic Courts of New York State including the New York TVB and the local justice Courts.  Our main office is in White Plains, New York but we also have offices in the Putnam and Orange Counties.

Our attorneys work to protect your license and insurance rates.

Good luck on the road.

An order of protection may be granted in a number of different cases pursuant to various criminal and civil statutes, including Criminal Procedural Law sections 530.12(1) and 530.13(1); Articles 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 of the Family Court Act; and Section 240(3) of the Domestic Relations Law.  Generally, orders of protection fall under two categories, temporary and permanent.  A temporary order of protection is typically made during the pendency of the action.  A permanent order of protection is usually issued at the conclusion or disposition of the case.  Frequently, temporary orders of protection precede permanent orders of protection.  

New York Law prohibits the extension of an order of protection to a person(s) unrelated to the underlying criminal action.  See People v. Konieczny, 2004 WL 1263762 (N.Y. 2004).  The order of protection may cover the complainant and family or household, but not beyond.  People v. Petrusch, 306 A.D.2d 889.

Orders of protection may also be issued in instances where the person being “protected” by the order opposes the terms of the order of protection and does not want the defendant being barred from contacting him or her.  People v. Monacelli, 299 A.D.2d 916.  This particular event often occurs in cases involving spouses and families. 

In criminal cases, an order of protection may be part of the court’s order allowing for the defendant release from custody.  CPL Sections 530.12 (family offenses) and CPL 530.13 (non-family offenses).  At times, a court may issue an order of protection on its own, based upon “good cause shown”, when an accusatory instrument (complaint) is filed by the prosecution.  In such an instance, the defendant has a right to contest the issuance of the order of protection in those circumstances where a constitutionally protected right, such as being excluded from the defendant’s residence or being prohibited from contacting the defendant’s family, is restricted.

Also, a court can suspend or revoke a pistol permit and possession of firearms.  A defendant has a right to hearing on the issue of firearms.  It should be noted that a violation of an order of protection due to firearm possession is also a violation of federal criminal law.

By understanding these important aspect of the law as they pertain to orders of protection, the criminal, matrimonial and family law (child custody, child support, family offense) trial attorneys of Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP continue to successfully assist their many clients.

If you or someone you know needs the assistant of a criminal, family or matrimonial attorney, please contact Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP for a free consultation.  The firms trial attorneys regularly appear in the courts of Westchester, Bronx, Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess and Orange Counties in New York State.

A common mistake is to look at a traffic ticket in New York and think, all is lost, there can be no possible defense.  Usually there are several defenses to a traffic ticket and as any good criminal defense attorney will tell you it all starts with the traffic ticket itself.

In New York State traffic tickets are written for any crime or violation under the New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL).  Tickets can be written for moving violations such as speeding, non-moving violations, equipment violations even DWI and DWAI Drugs.  The traffic ticket is the basis for a prosecution and it the starting point for the defense to the charge.

1. The Ticket (Simplified Traffic Information)   

The Ticket is usually a half page document, yellow in color, that a police officer would hand you on the side of the road.  A State Trooper may provide you with a full page ticket (white in color) but usually its the front and the back of the “yellow” ticket on one page.  The front of the ticket outlines the charge while the back has instructions regarding how to respond.  The ticket is also known as a Simplified Traffic Information.

The sufficiency of a simplified traffic information is governed by the criminal procedure law.  Because the traffic ticket is the local court accusatory instrument that provides the least amount of information. the recipient is entitled as a matter of right, upon a timely request, to a supporting deposition.

2. The Supporting Deposition

The supporting deposition is a document that explains the charge in greater detail.  The supporting deposition must be completed by the police officer and must allege all of the elements of the offense.  The statute provides that the allegations may be made upon personal knowledge or upon information and belief providing reasonable cause to believe that the driver committed the offense charged. 

3. Probable Cause

The ticket and supporting deposition together must provide probable cause to believe that the traffic offense in questions was committed.  A supporting deposition that contains boxes checked off by the police officer is sufficient.

4. Time to request a Supporting Deposition from the Police

In some cases a driver will receive a supporting deposition from the police with the traffic ticket, usually issued by the State Police, but in most instances the police officer will only provide a traffic ticket without a supporting deposition.

The request a supporting deposition must be made within 30 days of the court appearance noted on the ticket.  Where the charge is a misdemeanor such as DWI or reckless driving the driver may request a deposition beyond the 30 day period up to 90 days with permission of the court.

5.  The Plea 

Always plea NOT GUILTY to a traffic ticket.  In most cases an experienced criminal defense lawyer can get the charge dismissed or reduced.  A guilty plea is the same as if you went to trial and were found guilty by the judge or jury.  Your best option is to contact one of our experienced criminal defense lawyers to aggressively attack the ticket and its contents even before appearing in Court.

A plea can be entered in court on the date at the bottom of the ticket or by a signed statement on the ticket by mail.  When pleading not guilty by mail, the plea must be sent by registered or certified or first-class mail and within 48 hours of receiving the ticket .  A driver may plea not guilty by mail and request a supporting deposition.  FAILURE to act in a timely matter will cause a loss of the right to the supporting deposition.

6.  Service of the Supporting Deposition

The deposition must be provided to the driver within 30 days of the court’s receipt of the request for it OR 5 days before trial whichever comes first.

7.  Failure to provide a Supporting Deposition

When the court orders the filing of a supporting deposition and the police officer fails to comply in a timely manner the ticket is rendered insufficient on its face and may result in a dismissal. 

The above is one of the basic and best defenses to traffic tickets.  Although there are many defenses this requirment always remains at the core.  It is important to have a traffic ticket attorney since the police officer may try to submit a late supporting deposition or other method to prevent the case from being dismissed.  Our traffic ticket attorneys are prepared to protect your rights and provide you with the best possible criminal defense either in a traffic ticket case, DWI case or other criminal matter.

If you have questions regarding your criminal matter or traffic ticket case call one of our attorneys for a free consultation. 

The best defense is a strong understanding of the criminal procedure law and how each court operates in New York State.

At an arraignment on a Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) charge the Court is required to suspend your New York State driver’s license or privilege to drive in New York State if a Blood Alcohol Contant (BAC) reading is at or above the legal limit of .08%.

There are certain findings a Court must make before they suspend you license pending prosecution but that will be addressed in another blog post.   However in sum, if the Court finds the paperwork sufficient that your BAC was .08% or greater they will suspend.

NEW YORK PROMPT SUSPENSION LAW

The New York Prompt Suspension law is the law which suspends your license at arraignment.  Many times an accused will appear at arraignment without an attorney and be told to surrender their license due to this law.  Almost everyone hands over their license without a full understanding of what just happened and at that moment realize they need an attorney.

Under the Prompt Suspension Law you will not be able to drive for at least 30 days.  In most cases the accused relys on their driver’s license and the consequences of not having a license to drive are devastating.  The Court has recognized the impact of not having a driver’s license for at least 30 days and has allowed the Courts to grant a “Hardship Privilege” to allow the accused to drive under certain curcimstances until the DWI paperwork is processed by DMV and the accused can apply for a Conditional License. Usually this takes 30 days.

THE HARDSHIP PRIVILEGE

VTL 1193(2)(e)(7) governs the Hardship Privilege.  If the Court finds that the prompt suspension of the accused driver’s license will result in a “extreme hardship” the court must issue such suspension but may grant a Hardship Privilege to allow the accused to drive under certain circumstances.  The accused driver’s license is still suspended but a document is issued to the accused from the Court at arraignment allowing the accused to drive for a limited purpose.

What is an Extreme Hardship?

An Extreme Hardship is an inability to find alternative means of travel to or from the licensee’s employment, school or medical treatment.

In order for the accused to prove this Extreme Hardship they are entitled to a hearing within 3 days of the arraignment.  This fact is rarely told to an accused without an attorney and is a vital right to protect ones driver’s license.

The accused must present proof at the Hardship Hearing that there is no alternative means of travel such as family, friends, co-workers, taxis, buses or trains.  The accused must also have some evidence to corroborate that without a license it will be an Extreme Hardship in that they may lose their job, fail school or miss medical appointments.  A witness to corroborate these facts is usually necessaryat the hearing.  The District Attorney will have an opportunity to be heard on this issue and cross examine any witnesses including the accused.

THE PURPOSE OF A HARDSHIP LICENSE

The Hardship License is for a limited purpose.  The license will not allow an accused to drive as part of their employment (taxi driver, traveling salesman) or travel at inconsistent hours.  Also, a Hardship License can not be used to operate a commercial vehicle.

It is always a good idea to contact a DWI lawyer immediately after the arrest.  In some cases I have had my clients call me at the police station.  At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP our DWI lawyers are always available to answer your questions and prepare you for every court appearance.  We offer a Free Consultation and can appear in Court on a moments notice.

The best DWI defense is to be prepared at every stage of the process.  Our attorneys protect your rights in every type of DWI case and will be happy to meet with you.  If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact us.