Posts Tagged ‘White Plains DWI Lawyer’

Prior DWI and a New DWI Felony Charge

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

Defending Multiple DWI Convictions

A second DWI charge within 10 years could be prosecuted as a felony.  This felony prosecution is discretionary unlike a predicate felony — second felony offender, that the prosecution must pursue.

Both predicate felony offender status and felony DWI invlove a conviction within 10 years. 

Predicate Felony

In calculating the time for a predicate felony, the law states that “sentencemust have been imposed more than 10 years before the commission of the felony” PL 70.06(1)(b)(iv). 

Felony DWI Law

The felony DWI statute refers to committing the new offense “after having been convicted of” the predicate crime.  VTL 1193(1)(c)(i).

This is an important distinction.  It is very important in either a DWI felony sitiuation or a Felony under the Penal Law to know this difference.

A “conviction” is defined in the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) as “the entry of a plea of guilty to, or a verdict of guilty upon an accusatory instrument” CPL 1.20(13).  A judgment is the conviction AND the sentence imposed.  Sometimes in criminal court the conviction will be months before the sentence.  Usually this occurs when the Court orders a pre-sentence report from the Department of Probation.

Felony DWI Example

Where a motorist was sentencedon the prior DWI and occurred within the 10 year limit, but the motorist plead guilty or was convicted at trial more than10 years ago, felony DWI status should not apply.  Therefore, where sentencing is adjourned this time delay should not be used at a later point to increase a seconf felony DWI to a felony.

Misdemeanor DWI

In any DWI offense this rule will apply.  For example, two prior DWAIs within 10 years raises the current DWAI to a Misdemeanor from a violation.

Defense of a Felony DWI

In order to present the best criminal defense a criminal defense attorney in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam counties or elsewhere need to be aware of the date of arrest, conviction and sentence in order to properly defend a DWI felony charge.

DWI and Drug Lab Reports at Trial

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

During a trial the government needs to prove each and every element of a crime.  In cases such as petit larceny, assault, weapons possession, driving with a suspended license (AUO) (511(1)(a)) and other similar crimes a lab report is not needed.  But in cases such as DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and drug cases such as criminal possession of a controlled substance and criminal sale of a controlled substance a lab report will be  needed to be introduced at sometime during the trial.

District Attorneys have relied on certified records to introduce certain lab reports in DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and other drug cases instead of having the actual lab analyst testify.  This seems to be changing with the most recent US Supreme Court case as outlined below.

Lab Reports at Trial in DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug  and Drug Cases

At trial for an offense involving any Laboratory Report (usually a drug, DWI or gun charge case) the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment requires a criminal accused to be confronted with the testimony of lab analysts.

The United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 129 S Ct 2527, held that a lab analyst’s certificate is testimonial and can not be admitted unless the analyst was unavailable to testify at trial and the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the analyst.

DWI Blood/Breath Test Lab Reports

In Nassau County after a DWI trial the court sustained the defendant’s objection to the admission of the calibration log of the breathalyzer machine used to test his blood alcohol level as a certified business record and required the prosecution to present live testimony from the lab technicians who preformed the calibration.

The Best Criminal Defense

The best criminal defense is one that holds the government to their burden on each and every element of the crime.  This is especially true of DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other Controlled Substance cases where a lab report is necessary.  In Westchester, Rockland, Bronx, Orange, Putnam and Dutchess counties the government will have their own report usually from the County Department of Lab and Research.  These lab reports must be attacked for their accuracy.  This additional requirement that the government bring the actual analyst into court is helpful to the experienced criminal defense attorney and the accused since it opens the door to in depth cross examination.

White Plains City Court Criminal Defense 

In the City Court of White Plains there has been an increase use by the department of labs and research in Westchester County of “preliminary” lab reports to support DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other drug charges.  These lab reports are the very reports that need to be scrutinized for their accuracy and demanding the actual lab analyst to testify will help any criminal defense.

Southeast DWI Criminal Defense

Likewise, for any criminal defense for a DWI, DWAI, DWAI drug charge in busy DWI courts such as the Town of Southeast in Putnam County (Brewster).  These lab reports must be scrutinized as they usually are the prosecutions strongest form of evidence.

DWI Breathalyzer Calibration

Saturday, July 11th, 2009

DWI arrest & BAC level

In a DWI arrest the police will need to use a method to test the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of a driver’s blood to determine if the driver is intoxicated or impaired after consuming alcohol.  The most common method is to have the motorist blow into a machine to test the alcohol level in the motorist blood.  The machine looks like a large computer and has a keypad in the front.  After blowing into a tube for a few seconds the machine will test the motorist’s breath and submit a result to the police.   The machine’s calibration in any DWI test must be investigated and attacked.

Proof of Breathalyzer Calibration

In New York State the proof necessary by the prosecution in a DWI case is that the Breathalyzer was in proper working order at the time the test was administered to the motorist.  The prosecution has this burden at trial and must prove this element beyond a reasonable doubt.  The prosecution typically introduce into evidence a document entitled “record of calibration/maintenance.”  This is also called the certificate of calibration of the Breathalyzer.

What is a Calibration?

In the field of DWI defense “calibration” refers to the inspection, calibration and repair of the breath test devices by specially trained technicians at facilities such as the New York State Police Crime Laboratory or the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Public Safety.  This calibration is NOT the weekly test conducted by the police officers at the police station.  This is a much more complex test for calibration.

Suppression of a Breath Test due to Calibration

In People v Todd, 79 Misc.2d 630, a breathalyzer had not been calibrated for six months and the People failed to establish that the breathalyzer apparatus had been timely calibrated hence the results of the test were inadmissible.  It is incumbent upon the District Attorney to show that the machine was in proper working order.

Todd Six Month Calibration Rule

Although lower courts have expanded the six month rule with respect to the calibration of a Breathalyzer the Court of Appeals has never reversed or altered its six month rule.  This is something that the best criminal defense DWI lawyers must investigate when defending a DWI arrest.

New Breathalyzer Machines

The New York State Police have chosen to calibrate their newest breath test device, the Draeger AlcoTest 7110 MK III (Draeger) only one a year.  Regardless the prosecution must lay a sufficient foundation as to the reliability of the Draeger.  The Todd rule should apply and the government can present expert witnesses to prove calibration.

DWI Defense Lawyers

At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP our DWI defense lawyers investigate every aspect of a DWI arrest.  The best DWI defense will take advantage of every opportunity to limit the government’s case or have the case dismissed outright.  The calibration of the breathalyzer is only one part of the defense to a chemical test of a motorist’s breath test but an important part since the local police have no control over the calibration and usually have no idea how the machine is calibrated.

Free Consultation on all DWI arrests and cases

To have your case reviewed for Free call our office.  We represent clients in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam, Bronx & Dutchess Counties.  Our attorneys are former prosecutors and dedicated to reviewing your matter and providing you with the best criminal defense.  The Breathlyzer calibration is an important part of a DWI criminal defense and our Westchester County DWI lawyers will review your case, identify the best defense and give you candid straightforward advice.

DWI and the Field Sobriety Tests

Saturday, June 20th, 2009

Driving While Intoxicated and the Field Sobriety Tests

Field Sobriety Tests (FST) are a common method to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that a person is Driving While Intoxicated (DWI).  The New York State police, local police and county police use FST as part of any DWI stop and DWI investigation.  In those tests a motorist is asked to step out of their vehicle and engage in a number of physical acts which are designed to test a person’s coordination for the purposes of determining intoxication.  Motorists generally cooperate with these tests and rarely refuse to take these FST.  If the FST are refused your driver’s license will NOT be suspended unlike a chemical test refusal.

In any DWI investigation in New York State, these tests will be offered.  In Bedford Court in Westchester County, White Plains City Court in Westchester County, Yonkers City Court, Southeast (Brewster) Court, or any other court in Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam or Dutchess Counties the Courts will provide a motorist a list of FST at arraignment.  It is usually a form with boxes checked off regarding the test, if the tests were refused and if the motorist passed or failed the FST.  The State Police have a standardized form but local police may used their own form.

What are These Tests?

The FST commonly use include the following:

  1. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN) –  In this test the office asks you to follow his pen with your eyes.  The test looks for an involuntary jerking motion of your eyes.  Although this test can be used by the officer to determine intoxication it is rarely admitted into evidence at trial.
  2. The Walk and Turn Test — In this test you are asked to walk heal to toe, turn and walk heal to toe again.  Usually it is anywhere from 1-10 steps.  Rarely is this test given on a flat surface on a painted line.  Usually its on the side of the road with cars driving by at 60-70 miles per hour, at night with the police car lights flashing in the background. 
  3. One Leg Stand — The officer will ask you to stand on one leg for 30 seconds.  The officer is looking for swaying, moving arms up more than six inches for balance (most individuals keep their arms to their side making the test very hard), hopping or putting your foot down.
  4. Finger to Nose Test — In this test a motorist is asked to stand with their feet together, close their eyes, extend their arms out and touch the tip of their finger to the tip of their nose.
  5. ABC Test — In the Alphabet test, the officer will ask the motorist to recite the alphabet test usually from the middle to the end.

The Defense to the DWI, Field Sobriety Tests

There may be additional tests but the above are the major tests a police officer will use to determine intoxication.  The tests are all defensible.  The best criminal defense to a DWI charge is an attack of these tests including:

  1. Lack of instructions regarding how to perform the test.
  2. Lack of officer demonstration regarding how to perform the test.
  3. Conditions during the test, such as performed on a busy highway.
  4. The subjective nature of the test.
  5. Officer’s presumption of guilt that they are just “going through the motions” before an arrest.
  6. The officer rushing the tests.
  7. The motorist actually passed the test and the officer marked it as failed.

There are of course more ways to defend the FST test but this is just a general line of attack for the best criminal defense, every person is in a different position.  For example, in the defense of a DWI charge on 684 in North Castle (Armonk), New York the officer allowed a women to take her 2 inch high heals off but was told to perform the one leg stand test and walk and turn test on the side of the road with rocks, dirt and even glass under her feet clearly putting her at a disadvantage.  The defense of a DWI charge is always tailored to your specific facts and circumstances.

Criminal Defense of the Field Sobriety Tests

FST in any criminal defense must be attacked since the District Attorney will use that test as strong evidence of guilt.  Since all the police have to do is check off a box there is the temptation to rush through the tests and check off as many boxes as possible.  That is the first and best criminal defense to DWI, FST.  Our DWI criminal defense lawyers cross examine the administration of the tests and the motorist’s performance but also the validity of the tests as an indicator of intoxication and the subjectivity of the judgment of the police officer.

FST and a Chemical Test Refusal

As a criminal defense attorney and a DWI criminal defense attorney I always prepare the best defense for my clients.  I review the evidence from the District Attorney and determine if they have a strong case or a weak case. 

FST will be used as evidence of guilt but your driver’s license will NOT be suspended if you refuse to take any of those tests.  However, if you refuse to submit to a chemical test your driver’s license will be suspended and you may also face civil penalties.  A chemical test will also be used a evidence of guilt. 

If its one’s goal to minimize the amount of evidence against them at trial and they refuse a chemical test to accomplish this the FST should be refused as well. 

The DWI Arrest

If the police feel you are intoxicated or impaired (DWI) (DWAI) they will make an arrest.  The best course of action after any arrest is to call a DWI criminal defense attorney.  Not only can a lawyer explain your rights to you and the best defense for your case but you should immediately feel better that your lawyer is attacking the case and will do whatever necessary to protect you.

If you or a family member is charged with a DWI related offense call my office for a free consultation.  We regularly appear in the Courts of Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, Rockland and the Bronx.

The DWI Refusal Defense in New York State

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

The DWI Administrative Refusal Hearing

In New York State, you are deemed to have given your consent to a breath, blood, or urine sample to determine your Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) at the time of a DWI arrest. You may however, refuse to consent to a BAC test. In fact, the police department and State Police are required to read you standard “Refusal Warnings” outlining the consequences of a refusal to submit to a chemical test.

Those warnings are:

  1. You are under arrest for driving while intoxicated
  2. A refusal to submit to a chemical test, or any portion thereof, will result in the immediate suspension and subsequent revocation of you license or operating privilege, whether or not you are convicted of the charge for which you are arrested.
  3. If you refuse to submit to a chemical test, or any portion thereof, your refusal can be introduced into evidence against you at any trial, proceeding, or hearing resulting from this arrest.
  4. Will you submit to a chemical test of your (breath/blood/urine) for alcohol? or (will you submit to a chemical analysis of your blood/urine for drugs?)

These warnings will be read to you and the Officer will usually ask you to initial a form with the warnings. One does not get to pick what type of test they would like to take for a BAC reading, but the warnings must be conveyed in clear and unequivocal language.

A DWI Refusal Hearing will be held at the Department of Motor Vehicles within 15 days of the arraignment on the DWI charge.

The license will be surrendered to the Court at arraignment and there is no eligibility for either a Hardship or Conditional license during this 15 day period from the Court or DMV. The Officer and the driver must appear at the scheduled Refusal Hearing at the Department of Motor Vehicles.

  • If the driver fails to appear, the Refusal Hearing is deemed to be waived and the mandatory civil suspension takes effect.
  • If the Officer fails to appear the driver’s license is restored until the rescheduled date.

At the hearing if the driver is found to have refused to submit to a breath, blood, or urine test for the DWI, the license is revoked for one year.

The only way to get your driver’s license back with conditional privileges is to plead guilty or be found guilty of an alcohol related violation (DWAI or DWI) assuming no prior alcohol charges within the last five years. After a guilty finding the driver can enter the Drinking Driver Program and obtain a Conditional license (12 months) for use to, from and during work, child care, medical and dental for the motorist and members of the household. Additionally, DMV offers a three hour weekly block of time of your choosing for personal matters.

A DMV Administrative Refusal Hearing, not a criminal court, The Judge can convict you on the Officer’s DWI paperwork even if the Officer does not appear.

The standard of proof is “Clear and Convincing” not “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”.

If the Judge finds that you refused to submit to a test, your license will be revoked for one year. If, on the other hand, the Judge decides the paperwork, procedure, or testimony was not proper, then the ALJ could dismiss the case. The license would be restored.

The Refusal Hearing is important to our Criminal Defense DWI lawyers since it is an opportunity to cross examine the police officer before trial.

Many times our clients request a transcript of the hearing testimony to use at trial. Unlike a civil case depositions are not taken in a criminal case this however is an opportunity to get as much information out of the Officer about the arrest. In most cases this is an advantage for the New York State DWI Lawyer. Our DWI lawyers are always focused on providing the best possible defense and aggressively protecting your rights.

At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP we have worked with clients in DWI refusal cases. The hearings are an important part of and DWI criminal defense and should be attended. In most cases the client has nothing to lose and everything to gain from fighting at a refusal hearing. Refusal hearings are generally conducted in the County of the arrest. Out DWI defense attorneys will defend these matters in any County in New York State including Westchester, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess, Rockland and the Bronx. It is important to act quickly to prepare the defense and be ready for the hearing as the hearing will be held within 15 days of arraignment.

Recently our attorneys represented a client at a DMV Refusal Hearing in the City of Yonkers, Westchester County. The State Trooper testified but did not demonstrate that the driver was adequately notified of the consequences of a refusal. Our DWI defense attorney immediately made an application to the ALJ to dismiss the case and that application was granted. The client walked away with his license and none of the consequences of a DMV Refusal including financial penalties.

If you have been arrested for DWI in New York State , you need an skilled NY attorney. Contact our office to discuss the defense of the case and your options to proceed. We are available for a free consultation for all cases and can explain the DWI Refusal Defense in New York State and how it relates to your case.