When you are facing difficult legal issues, you want a lawyer who will provide an honest and straightforward assessment and candid legal advice. When you come to the law offices of Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP, our skilled attorneys offer candid advice and more. Contact us today to discuss your legal concerns.
We are a full service law firm with offices conveniently located in White Plains, The Bronx, and New Windsor, New York. We believe in regular communication with every client to keep them fully informed of the status of their case at all times and to ensure that each client understands their case or legal issues. We will work diligently to preserve, protect and defend your rights and best interests in a wide range of practice areas, including criminal defense, personal injury, estate planning and education law.
At Riebling, Proto & Sachs, LLP you will have the benefit of a team of experienced attorneys working on your case. It is not uncommon for our attorneys to work collaboratively to develop innovative and effective solutions. Our combined experience will be put to your benefit.
We understand that each of our clients has different needs. With the help of a skilled staff, we work to develop a cost-effective, personalized legal solution that efficiently resolves our clients' legal concerns while minimizing disruption to their lives.
Our attorneys include former assistant district attorneys, trial lawyers and insurance company lawyers. We apply our experience to provide you with the most comprehensive legal advice possible. From criminal defense to personal injury litigation, we have the experience, skill, and dedication to help you get results.
March 7th, 2010
Changes to the New York State DWI Laws
New DWI Felony
It is now a class “E” felony to drive while intoxicated (DWI) with a child 15 years of age or younger in the car. In addition, if the defendant is the parent, legal guardian, or custodian of the child in the vehicle, the police MUST file a report with Child Protective Services (CPS).
Also, in Westchester County and other surrounding counties such as Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange and the Bronx it is common to see an additional charge of Endangering the Welfare of a Child (EWC) for such a DWI arrest.
This new felony change and the usual accompanying EWC charge are common and place a burden on the defendant not only with respect to a criminal charge but also for school, employment and special licenses in addition to the penalties for DWI. It is common to have to address most of these penalties even before one is found guilty. Prompt legal representation is very important to address these issues to aggressively present the best defense.
Ignition Interlock Device — New Law
Beginning on August 15, 2010, courts will be required to sentence defendants after conviction for a DWI offense to probation or a conditional discharge a condition of which MUST be the installation and maintenance of an ignition interlock device in any car owned or operated by the defendant for the duration of the probation or conditional discharge or 6 months, whichever is longer.
The cost of the installation and maintenance must be paid by the defendant unless the court finds that the person is financially unable to afford the cost in such cases the court may waive the cost or impose the cost pursuant to a payment plan.
DWI Law Updates
For more information about the DWI law changes or DWI laws in New York State in general feel free to contact our firm. We appear in all courts in New York including Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange, Rockland and New York City.
December 5th, 2009
Statute of Limitations
Criminal matters in New York State are governed by a statute of limitations. The time within which a criminal action may be brought is the statute of limitations. Most of the time the statute of limitations refers to the time allowed to bring a civil action however, the similar legal theory also applies to the prosecution of a criminal offense.
Generally the more serious the crime the longer the prosecution has to bring the charges. In the case of Class A felonies, such as Murder, there is no limitation on when the action may be commenced.
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
-
Class A Felony — No time limit, CPL 30.10(2)(a)
-
Other Felonies — 5 years, CPL 30.10(2)(b)
-
Misdemeanor — 2 years, CPL 30.10(2)(c)
-
Violations — 1 year, CPL 30.10(2)(d)
Generally after a crime is committed charges must be filed within the above time frames. CPL 1.20(17)
Speedy Trial
Usually in a criminal matter charges are filed with the Court almost immediately. However, an accused has a right to a speedy trial once the charges are filed with the Court. The United States Constitution (6th Amendment) and by law in New York State require a speedy trial. The laws governing speedy trial are some of the most complex in all criminal law however this overview should give you a good understanding of the speedy trial laws in New York State.
These laws are litigated in every county including Westchester County, Orange County, Putnam, Rockland and Dutchess County. In local criminal courts such as White Plains City Court, County Court, Yonkers, Greenburgh, Bedford, North Castle, Mount Vernon, Newburgh, Goshen, New Windsor, Southeast, Kent and other similar Courts all keep records of speedy trial time.
The right to a speedy trial is broken down into two areas a Constitutional Speedy Trial Right and a Statutory Speedy Trial Right.
Constitutional Speedy Trial
The constitutional speedy trial looks to the length of time between the commencement of the action against the defendant and the commencement of trial. A due process argument may be made if an inordinate amount of delay has occurred between stages in a criminal matter such as between commission of the offense and arrest. This applies to all offenses.
To usually obtain dismissal of a criminal matter on constitutional speedy trial grounds in New York State any argument must include a showing that the accused has been prejudiced by the prosecutions failure to prosecute the charge in question. If the delay is significant (usually a number of years) prejudice need not be shown unless there was justification for the delay (People v Guzman, 227 AD2d 219).
The Court will consider five factors to determine dismissal on Constitional speedy trial grounds. Those factors include:
- The length of the delay
- The reason for the delay
- The degree of actual prejudice to the defendant
- The seriousness of the underlying charge
- the extent of any pretrial incarceration
See, People v Taranovich 37 NY2d 442 and People v Vernace 96 NY 2d 886
Statutory Speedy Trial under CPL 30.30
CPL 30.30 the speedy trial statute requires the People announce their readiness for trial within a certain amount of time after the action has been commenced against the defendant. The important dates are the date of the commencement of the action and the date on which the prosecution announces readiness for trial.
The trial does not actually have to begin but if the people do not or can not announce readiness the case will be dismissed as a violation of the statutory speedy trial law.
CPL 30.30 — Time restrictions
-
-
-
B Misdemeanor — 60 Days
-
Violation — 30 days
-
Traffic Infraction — N/A
There are excludable periods of time that will stop the speedy trial clock and the prosecution will not be charged with the delay. Some of the excludable time includes:
-
Reasonable period of delay attributable to other proceedingsconcerning the defendant such as a competency proceeding, demands to produce, pre-trial motions, appeals.
-
Adjournments at the request of the defendant or consented to by the defendant.
-
The defendant is absent or unavailable, such as a bench warrant or in jail in another jurisdiction.
-
Time that the defendant is without counsel.
The Best Speedy Trial Defense
The best speedy trial defense involves a calculation of time starting with the date of the alleged crime itself and determining what time is chargeable to the prosecution as a violation of either statutory or due process rights.
Some cases may be dismissed in court others require a written motion. A clear understanding of the various time periods is required.
November 1st, 2009
Felony Complaint, Indictment, Superior Court Information (SCI)
All felonies in New York State must be charged by either a Felony Complaint, Indictment or a Superior Court Information (SCI). In Westchester County, Rockland, Orange, Putnam and Dutchess Counties it is common to see a felony charged by way of a Felony Complaint. However, in New York City, Bronx, Queens and Brooklyn Felony Complaints are rare.
FELONY
First, some basic information about Felony Charges. A Felony is a charge that can result in State Prison upon conviction usually over one year. In New York State felonies are the most serious crimes. Felonies are classified from the most serious “A” felonies to the less serious “E” felonies. All felonies have the potential for a state prison sentence and are generally more complex then lesser crimes.
Accusatory Instrument
An “Accusatory Instrument” is the generic term that describes a variety of documents used to accuse a person of a crime. A Felony Complaint, Indictment and Superior Court Information are all “Accusatory Instruments”. The Accusatory Instrument sets forth the crime charged and in most cases the facts supporting the crimes charged.
Felony Complaint
A felony complaint serves as the basis for the commencement of a criminal action, but NOT as the basis for a prosecution. CPL 100.10 and CPL 1.20. Basically, a Felony Complaint can start a case but not finish it. In order for the case to be brought to trial an Indictment or Superior Court Information is necessary.
In Westchester County, Putnam, Dutchess, Rockland and Orange counties in a local justice court such as Bedford, White Plains City Court, Greenburgh, Yonkers, North Castle, Port Chester in Westchester County a Felony Complaint will be filed by the police and the District Attorney. When an accused appears in those courts or any justice court a felony complaint will charge a felony. If an accused appears in County Court such as White Plains, Westchester County Court at 111 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. or in Goshen, New York in Orange County Court 255-285 Main Street a felony charge is usually prosecuted by way of an Indictment or Superior Court Information.
Indictment
An indictment occurs only after a grand jury has voted to prosecute a charge(s) against an accused. The Grand Jury Process will be discussed in another blog but for these purposes the point is that a felony must be prosecuted by way of indictment after a grand jury vote.
Superior Court Information
A Superior Court Information (SCI) is an instrument that a prosecutor can use to charge a felony but only if the accused waives their right to a Grand Jury. An SCI is usually a accusatory instrument filed by the District Attorney during a plea bargain on a felony charge in County Court. As part of that plea bargain the accused must agree to waive prosecution by Indictment and therefore a Grand Jury presentation. Since this is a plea bargain it is usually agreed to prior to Court.
Speedy Trial and Discovery Concerns
Since a Felony Complaint is not a trial instrument, a prosecutor in local court can not announce readiness for trial under CPL 30.30. Such and announcement would be illusory. Readiness for trial on a felony charge requires an indictment.
Where a felony is charged in local court the accused is arraigned on the felony and arraigned on the felony again after an indictment. Once the arraignment after indictment defense counsel will be able to obtain discovery, a bill of particulars, engage in motion practice and assert certain defenses.
Best Felony Defense
The best defense on any felony charge is to get as much information from the prosecution as possible before an indictment. By way of policy several District Attorney Offices are less willing to negotiate with an accused after an indictment. This is true in Westchester County, Putnam, Dutchess, Rockland and Orange Counties. Of course, every case is different but the main concern is to avoid indictment if possible since the penalties are much more severe than a charge of a misdemeanor or violation. Also, an accused does have the right to testify at a grand jury presentation and in some cases this is absolutely essential.
If an Indictment has already been handed down without a felony complaint it is very important to obtain all of the discovery in the case quickly and review the file with the accused to determine the best defense. Afterwards, the criminal defense attorney should immediately contact the district attorney to determine their position on the case, and get any more information not obtained in discovery to determine the strength of the prosecutions case. Only then can accused make an informed decision regarding how to proceed. Lastly, it is absolutely essential that the accused and their attorney keep in contact with each other on a regular basis.
I hope this information has proven helpful. The differences between Felony Complaint, Indictment and Superior Court Information (SCI) are important and should be reviewed carefully since there are so many different consequences at each level.
October 25th, 2009
Defending Multiple DWI Convictions
A second DWI charge within 10 years could be prosecuted as a felony. This felony prosecution is discretionary unlike a predicate felony — second felony offender, that the prosecution must pursue.
Both predicate felony offender status and felony DWI invlove a conviction within 10 years.
Predicate Felony
In calculating the time for a predicate felony, the law states that “sentencemust have been imposed more than 10 years before the commission of the felony” PL 70.06(1)(b)(iv).
Felony DWI Law
The felony DWI statute refers to committing the new offense “after having been convicted of” the predicate crime. VTL 1193(1)(c)(i).
This is an important distinction. It is very important in either a DWI felony sitiuation or a Felony under the Penal Law to know this difference.
A “conviction” is defined in the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) as “the entry of a plea of guilty to, or a verdict of guilty upon an accusatory instrument” CPL 1.20(13). A judgment is the conviction AND the sentence imposed. Sometimes in criminal court the conviction will be months before the sentence. Usually this occurs when the Court orders a pre-sentence report from the Department of Probation.
Felony DWI Example
Where a motorist was sentencedon the prior DWI and occurred within the 10 year limit, but the motorist plead guilty or was convicted at trial more than10 years ago, felony DWI status should not apply. Therefore, where sentencing is adjourned this time delay should not be used at a later point to increase a seconf felony DWI to a felony.
Misdemeanor DWI
In any DWI offense this rule will apply. For example, two prior DWAIs within 10 years raises the current DWAI to a Misdemeanor from a violation.
Defense of a Felony DWI
In order to present the best criminal defense a criminal defense attorney in Westchester, Orange, Rockland, Putnam counties or elsewhere need to be aware of the date of arrest, conviction and sentence in order to properly defend a DWI felony charge.
October 8th, 2009
During a trial the government needs to prove each and every element of a crime. In cases such as petit larceny, assault, weapons possession, driving with a suspended license (AUO) (511(1)(a)) and other similar crimes a lab report is not needed. But in cases such as DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and drug cases such as criminal possession of a controlled substance and criminal sale of a controlled substance a lab report will be needed to be introduced at sometime during the trial.
District Attorneys have relied on certified records to introduce certain lab reports in DWI, DWAI, DWAI drugs and other drug cases instead of having the actual lab analyst testify. This seems to be changing with the most recent US Supreme Court case as outlined below.
Lab Reports at Trial in DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and Drug Cases
At trial for an offense involving any Laboratory Report (usually a drug, DWI or gun charge case) the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment requires a criminal accused to be confronted with the testimony of lab analysts.
The United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 129 S Ct 2527, held that a lab analyst’s certificate is testimonial and can not be admitted unless the analyst was unavailable to testify at trial and the accused had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the analyst.
DWI Blood/Breath Test Lab Reports
In Nassau County after a DWI trial the court sustained the defendant’s objection to the admission of the calibration log of the breathalyzer machine used to test his blood alcohol level as a certified business record and required the prosecution to present live testimony from the lab technicians who preformed the calibration.
The Best Criminal Defense
The best criminal defense is one that holds the government to their burden on each and every element of the crime. This is especially true of DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other Controlled Substance cases where a lab report is necessary. In Westchester, Rockland, Bronx, Orange, Putnam and Dutchess counties the government will have their own report usually from the County Department of Lab and Research. These lab reports must be attacked for their accuracy. This additional requirement that the government bring the actual analyst into court is helpful to the experienced criminal defense attorney and the accused since it opens the door to in depth cross examination.
White Plains City Court Criminal Defense
In the City Court of White Plains there has been an increase use by the department of labs and research in Westchester County of “preliminary” lab reports to support DWI, DWAI, DWAI Drug and other drug charges. These lab reports are the very reports that need to be scrutinized for their accuracy and demanding the actual lab analyst to testify will help any criminal defense.
Southeast DWI Criminal Defense
Likewise, for any criminal defense for a DWI, DWAI, DWAI drug charge in busy DWI courts such as the Town of Southeast in Putnam County (Brewster). These lab reports must be scrutinized as they usually are the prosecutions strongest form of evidence.